Take a look at Suncor's in situ performance data

Take a look at Suncor's in situ performance data

Take a look at Suncor's in situ performance data

Take a look at Suncor's in situ performance data

View the latest Report on Sustainability

Terra Nova Floating, Production Storage and Offloading (FPSO) vessel

In Situ

Performance data for our In Situ business includes MacKay River and Firebag operations. Economic data for In Situ is included with Oil Sands performance data.

Expand all | Collapse all

Environment

In the "Footnote" column, click on the down-arrow symbol to display the footnote.

Indicator Unit Footnote GRI
Disclosures
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Production                
Net production million barrels of oil / year OG1 32.7 47.8 62.84 72.79 79.37

Footnote A:
Beginning in 2012, production stated is net bitumen sales. Previously-stated production was gross bitumen production and associated natural gas production, internally consumed and/or lost through practices such as flaring. The net volume is used to calculate emission intensities as it represents emissions associated with total plant saleable product. In 2014, production increased mainly due to this being the first full year of operations from all four stages of Firebag’s operations.

Net production million cubic metres (m3) of oil / year OG1 5.2 7.6 9.99 11.57 12.62

Footnote A:
Beginning in 2012, production stated is net bitumen sales. Previously-stated production was gross bitumen production and associated natural gas production, internally consumed and/or lost through practices such as flaring. The net volume is used to calculate emission intensities as it represents emissions associated with total plant saleable product. In 2014, production increased mainly due to this being the first full year of operations from all four stages of Firebag’s operations.

Air emissions                
Greenhouse gas (GHG) thousand tonnes carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) G4-EN18 2,608 4,079 5,390
5,610 5,620

Footnote B:
Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions are calculated using a facility-specific methodology which utilizes various reference methodologies that have been accepted by the relevant jurisdictions each facility is required to report its GHG emissions.  Methodology has been followed where a jurisdiction has a prescribed one and if none exists then the most applicable and accurate methods available are used to quantify each emission source.

GHG emissions and emissions intensity values are consistent with Suncor’s Specified Gas Emitter’s Regulation (SGER) Bill 3 reported Total Annual Emission (TAE) value, with an exception. The reported TAE in the SGER Compliance report excludes CO2 emissions from total indirect sources, such as third-party cogen from MacKay River.

Firebag data in this report includes all cogen emissions as Scope 1. MacKay River data includes all third-party cogen emissions associated with the steam and electricity we consume as Scope 2. Beginning in 2014 and amended in 2015, MacKay River implemented a new methodology for calculating these indirect emissions; therefore all reported data has been calculated using this method.
In Situ experienced a decrease in emission intensity compared to past years. Read more on our GHG performance.

GHG emissions intensity tonnes CO2e / m3 production G4-EN18 0.5 0.54 0.54 0.48 0.45

Footnote B:
Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions are calculated using a facility-specific methodology which utilizes various reference methodologies that have been accepted by the relevant jurisdictions each facility is required to report its GHG emissions.  Methodology has been followed where a jurisdiction has a prescribed one and if none exists then the most applicable and accurate methods available are used to quantify each emission source.

GHG emissions and emissions intensity values are consistent with Suncor’s Specified Gas Emitter’s Regulation (SGER) Bill 3 reported Total Annual Emission (TAE) value, with an exception. The reported TAE in the SGER Compliance report excludes CO2 emissions from total indirect sources, such as third-party cogen from MacKay River.

Firebag data in this report includes all cogen emissions as Scope 1. MacKay River data includes all third-party cogen emissions associated with the steam and electricity we consume as Scope 2. Beginning in 2014 and amended in 2015, MacKay River implemented a new methodology for calculating these indirect emissions; therefore all reported data has been calculated using this method.
In Situ experienced a decrease in emission intensity compared to past years. Read more on our GHG performance.

Sulphur dioxide (SO2) thousand tonnes G4-EN21 0.47 0.53 0.5  0.52 0.36

Footnote C:
Suncor installed a sulphur recovery unit at Firebag in 2011

SO2 emissions intensity Kilograms (kg) / m3 production   G4-EN21 0.09 0.07 0.05  0.05 0.03
Nitrogen oxides (NOx) thousand tonnes G4-EN21 1.91 2.03 2.5  2.66 2.61

Footnote D:
In 2012 to 2014, increase in NOx emissions was due to the ramp-up of Firebag, which required an increase in steam generation to bring new wells online.

NOx emissions intensity kg / m3 production   G4-EN21 0.37 0.27 0.25  0.23 0.21
Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) thousand tonnes G4-EN21 0.21 0.23 0.3  0.36 0.36

Footnote E:
In 2012 to 2014, increase in total VOCs and specified VOCs emissions were due to the increase in steam generation required to bring new wells online.

  • Benzene
tonnes   G4-EN21 13.53 16.62 26.41  27.56 26.45
  • Toluene
tonnes   G4-EN21 8.33 18.03 14.99  15.52 13.29
  • Ethylbenzene
tonnes G4-EN21 0.37 0.25 0.21  0.30 0.01

Footnote F:
Values include emergency and non-emergency flaring volumes. Reductions in 2015 resulted from reduced venting and flaring from our Firebag facility.

  • Xylene
tonnes G4-EN21 3.74 11.46 3.46  3.45 0.13

Footnote F:
Values include emergency and non-emergency flaring volumes. Reductions in 2015 resulted from reduced venting and flaring from our Firebag facility.

VOC emissions intensity kg / m3 production   G4-EN21 0.04 0.03 0.03  0.03 0.03
National Pollutant Release Inventory (NPRI) on-site releases thousand tonnes   G4-EN21 6.95 7.32 6.94  8.34 7.98
Flared gas million m3 OG6 1.58 1.95 3.62 1.78 0.50

Footnote F:
Values include emergency and non-emergency flaring volumes. Reductions in 2015 resulted from reduced venting and flaring from our Firebag facility.

Flared gas intensity m3 / m3 production G4-EN21 0.3 0.26 0.36 0.15 0.04
Energy consumption                
Total energy use million gigajoules (GJ) G4-EN3
G4-EN4
45.46 67.26 85.93 89.48 93.27

Footnote G:
Total energy is the sum of direct and indirect energy. It includes combustion of natural gas and internally-produced fuels, flaring and electrical power imports. For MacKay River, exported electricity sent to the grid from the third party cogen is not claimed as an indirect; only the power consumed by Suncor Operations since the cogen is independently operated by TransCanada. For Firebag, the exported electricity to the grid is deducted from the total energy use since the cogen is operated by Suncor. Direct energy consumption is calculated using lower heating value (LHV) in order to be consistent with all other operating facilities.

  • Direct energy use
million GJ G4-EN3 37.4 63.94 86.28 90.45 92.96

Footnote H:
Direct energy is primary energy consumed on-site by Suncor operated facilities; it includes combustion of natural gas and internally produced fuels. 

Indirect energy includes imported electricity, steam, heating and cooling duty from third parties.

The indirect energy calculation methodology credits operations for electricity exported to external users and/or other Suncor facilities. The facility that exports the electricity subtracts the value from their indirect energy use. The facility that receives the electricity counts it as a Scope 2 indirect energy use, regardless of source. As such, Firebag indirect energy figures are negative, because the amount of electricity exported was higher in value than the amount of electricity imported. The negative Firebag indirect energy figures for 2013 and 2014 are higher than the MacKay River indirect energy figures, which is why the In Situ total indirect energy figures are negative for these years. For Firebag, the exported electricity (regardless of destination) is deducted from the indirect energy use since the cogen is operated by Suncor. For MacKay River, only the imported electricity (regardless of source) is reported as indirect energy use. Power sold to the grid by the MacKay River TransCanada cogen is not included in this number.

  • Indirect energy use
million GJ G4-EN4 8.06 3.32 -0.35 -0.97 0.31

Footnote H:
Direct energy is primary energy consumed on-site by Suncor operated facilities; it includes combustion of natural gas and internally produced fuels. 

Indirect energy includes imported electricity, steam, heating and cooling duty from third parties.

The indirect energy calculation methodology credits operations for electricity exported to external users and/or other Suncor facilities. The facility that exports the electricity subtracts the value from their indirect energy use. The facility that receives the electricity counts it as a Scope 2 indirect energy use, regardless of source. As such, Firebag indirect energy figures are negative, because the amount of electricity exported was higher in value than the amount of electricity imported. The negative Firebag indirect energy figures for 2013 and 2014 are higher than the MacKay River indirect energy figures, which is why the In Situ total indirect energy figures are negative for these years. For Firebag, the exported electricity (regardless of destination) is deducted from the indirect energy use since the cogen is operated by Suncor. For MacKay River, only the imported electricity (regardless of source) is reported as indirect energy use. Power sold to the grid by the MacKay River TransCanada cogen is not included in this number.

Energy intensity GJ / m3 production   G4-EN5 8.75 8.83 8.6 7.73 7.39
Energy saved through conservation and efficiency improvements thousand GJ   G4-EN6 513.37 0 0 0 0
Water use                
Total water withdrawal million m3 G4-EN8 0.27 0.83 0.88 1.57 2.03

Footnote I:
Beginning in 2014, In Situ reported new volumes of surface water withdrawn and industrial runoff water used for road dust suppression and ice road building. This water is also returned to the environment as part of these activities.

The volume of treated wastewater that Oil Sands sends to our Firebag In Situ facility is removed from Firebag’s water withdrawal volume and is accounted for in the Oil Sands’ withdrawal volume.

  • Surface water withdrawal
million m3 G4-EN8 0 0 0 0.13 0.13

Footnote I:
Beginning in 2014, In Situ reported new volumes of surface water withdrawn and industrial runoff water used for road dust suppression and ice road building. This water is also returned to the environment as part of these activities.

The volume of treated wastewater that Oil Sands sends to our Firebag In Situ facility is removed from Firebag’s water withdrawal volume and is accounted for in the Oil Sands’ withdrawal volume.

  • Groundwater withdrawal
million m3   G4-EN8 0.2 0.61 0.74 0.65 1.14
  • Treated wastewater from external organizations
million m3 G4-EN8 0 0 0 0 0

Footnote I:
Beginning in 2014, In Situ reported new volumes of surface water withdrawn and industrial runoff water used for road dust suppression and ice road building. This water is also returned to the environment as part of these activities.

The volume of treated wastewater that Oil Sands sends to our Firebag In Situ facility is removed from Firebag’s water withdrawal volume and is accounted for in the Oil Sands’ withdrawal volume.

  • Industrial run-off water
million m3 G4-EN8 0.06 0.23 0.14 0.79 0.76

Footnote I:
Beginning in 2014, In Situ reported new volumes of surface water withdrawn and industrial runoff water used for road dust suppression and ice road building. This water is also returned to the environment as part of these activities.

The volume of treated wastewater that Oil Sands sends to our Firebag In Situ facility is removed from Firebag’s water withdrawal volume and is accounted for in the Oil Sands’ withdrawal volume.

Water withdrawal intensity m3 / m3 production G4-EN8 0.05 0.11 0.09 0.14 0.16

Footnote I:
Beginning in 2014, In Situ reported new volumes of surface water withdrawn and industrial runoff water used for road dust suppression and ice road building. This water is also returned to the environment as part of these activities.

The volume of treated wastewater that Oil Sands sends to our Firebag In Situ facility is removed from Firebag’s water withdrawal volume and is accounted for in the Oil Sands’ withdrawal volume.

Water returned million m3 G4-EN22 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.73 0.68

Footnote I:
Beginning in 2014, In Situ reported new volumes of surface water withdrawn and industrial runoff water used for road dust suppression and ice road building. This water is also returned to the environment as part of these activities.

The volume of treated wastewater that Oil Sands sends to our Firebag In Situ facility is removed from Firebag’s water withdrawal volume and is accounted for in the Oil Sands’ withdrawal volume.

Water consumption million m3   1.97 2.34 2.15 1.86 1.67

Footnote J:
Total Firebag and MacKay River water consumption is comprised of water withdrawn from licenced groundwater wells, treated wastewater and industrial run-off water, minus the water returned.

Water consumption intensity m3 / m3 production     0.38 0.31 0.22 0.16 0.13
Produced water million m3   OG5 -- 24.86 32.59 32.86 34.48
Average annual water recycling rate %   G4-EN2 92.48 94.5 94.6  97.6 98.1
Waste management              

Footnote K:
Beginning in 2011, in order to better align with GRI reporting guidelines, Suncor has expanded the number of indicators for which it collects and reports data in the Waste management category.

Prior to 2014, waste that was reused, recycled and recovered was not included in the totals for hazardous and non-hazardous waste generated and was reported as an aggregated total. Beginning in 2014, in order to provide a more detailed breakdown of the waste streams created due to our operations, we have included this category of waste in both hazardous and non-hazardous total waste generated.

Total hazardous waste generated thousand tonnes G4-EN23 437.2 764.9 987.3  1,209.0 1,020

Footnote K:
Beginning in 2011, in order to better align with GRI reporting guidelines, Suncor has expanded the number of indicators for which it collects and reports data in the Waste management category.

Prior to 2014, waste that was reused, recycled and recovered was not included in the totals for hazardous and non-hazardous waste generated and was reported as an aggregated total. Beginning in 2014, in order to provide a more detailed breakdown of the waste streams created due to our operations, we have included this category of waste in both hazardous and non-hazardous total waste generated.

  • Hazardous waste incinerated
tonnes   G4-EN23 4.5 2.3 0.55  0 0
  • Hazardous waste deep well injected
tonnes G4-EN23 382,767.00 704,829.00 901,377 951,648 1,018,064

Footnote L:

Hazardous waste landfilled is primarily off-spec warm lime sludge, created by upset. The period of time dealing with upset conditions at Firebag was a matter of weeks in 2013, compared to several months in2014.

Otherwise disposed includes cavern and ecopit disposal.

A reclassification of waste streams would result in the value of deep well injection in 2014 revised to 1,000,671 tonnes and 54,577 tonnes otherwise disposed in 2014 for a total hazardous waste generated value of 1,056 thousand tonnes in 2014.

  • Hazardous waste landfilled
tonnes G4-EN23 1,764.40 877.5 7,765.90 763.40 2,316

Footnote L:

Hazardous waste landfilled is primarily off-spec warm lime sludge, created by upset. The period of time dealing with upset conditions at Firebag was a matter of weeks in 2013, compared to several months in2014.

Otherwise disposed includes cavern and ecopit disposal.

A reclassification of waste streams would result in the value of deep well injection in 2014 revised to 1,000,671 tonnes and 54,577 tonnes otherwise disposed in 2014 for a total hazardous waste generated value of 1,056 thousand tonnes in 2014.

  • Hazardous waste otherwise disposed
tonnes G4-EN23 52,623.40 59,222.90 78,190.40 103,780.19 3

Footnote L:

Hazardous waste landfilled is primarily off-spec warm lime sludge, created by upset. The period of time dealing with upset conditions at Firebag was a matter of weeks in 2013, compared to several months in2014.

Otherwise disposed includes cavern and ecopit disposal.

A reclassification of waste streams would result in the value of deep well injection in 2014 revised to 1,000,671 tonnes and 54,577 tonnes otherwise disposed in 2014 for a total hazardous waste generated value of 1,056 thousand tonnes in 2014.

  • Hazardous waste recycled, recovered or reused
tonnes G4-EN23 -- -- --  100.98 0

Footnote K:
Beginning in 2011, in order to better align with GRI reporting guidelines, Suncor has expanded the number of indicators for which it collects and reports data in the Waste management category.

Prior to 2014, waste that was reused, recycled and recovered was not included in the totals for hazardous and non-hazardous waste generated and was reported as an aggregated total. Beginning in 2014, in order to provide a more detailed breakdown of the waste streams created due to our operations, we have included this category of waste in both hazardous and non-hazardous total waste generated.

Total non-hazardous waste generated thousand tonnes G4-EN23 97.5 111.47 95.02  92.19 332

Footnote K:
Beginning in 2011, in order to better align with GRI reporting guidelines, Suncor has expanded the number of indicators for which it collects and reports data in the Waste management category.

Prior to 2014, waste that was reused, recycled and recovered was not included in the totals for hazardous and non-hazardous waste generated and was reported as an aggregated total. Beginning in 2014, in order to provide a more detailed breakdown of the waste streams created due to our operations, we have included this category of waste in both hazardous and non-hazardous total waste generated.

  • Non-hazardous waste incinerated
 tonnes   G4-EN23    --  --  956 899
  • Non-hazardous waste landfilled
tonnes   G4-EN23 59,852 55,803.64 84,392.33 79,171.32

318,038

  • Non-hazardous waste otherwise disposed
tonnes G4-EN23 37,634 55,345.54 10,382.36 10,851.00  10,320

Footnote M:
Includes sewage sent to Fort McMurray.

  • Non-hazardous waste recycled, recovered or reused
tonnes G4-EN23 -- -- -- 1,209.00 2,951

Footnote K:
Beginning in 2011, in order to better align with GRI reporting guidelines, Suncor has expanded the number of indicators for which it collects and reports data in the Waste management category.

Prior to 2014, waste that was reused, recycled and recovered was not included in the totals for hazardous and non-hazardous waste generated and was reported as an aggregated total. Beginning in 2014, in order to provide a more detailed breakdown of the waste streams created due to our operations, we have included this category of waste in both hazardous and non-hazardous total waste generated.

Drilling waste disposed or treated tonnes OG7 -- 62,723.95 106,225.37 124,972.00  70,267

Footnote N:
This is hazardous and non-hazardous drilling waste.

Waste reused, recycled or recovered (off-site) thousand tonnes   G4-EN32 6.41 2.8 2.7 -- --
Waste reused, recycled or recovered (on-site) thousand tonnes G4-EN32 81.6 0 0 --  --

Footnote O:
Beginning in 2012, drilling waste with greater than 8% bitumen content, hauled to the mine for re-processing, is no longer reported as waste reused onsite but has been captured in the OG7 indicator.

Land disturbance and reclamation                
Total land lease holdings for potential development hectares   G4-EN11 181,053 181,053 181,053 181,053 181,053

Total land holdings approved for development

hectares   G4-EN11 24,003 24,537 24,537 24,537  24,537
Total land disturbed cumulative hectares   G4-EN12 990 1,172 1,356 1,632 1,600
Land reclaimed cumulative hectares G4-EN13 0 0 10.2 15  19.7

Footnote P:
Reclamation associated with the in situ footprint is tracked as the cumulative area reclaimed. As such, the total number of hectares reported from year to year may increase or decrease based on activities undertaken at the site since these activities may lead to new reclamation or re-disturbance of previously reclaimed areas. See Advisories.

Total number of producing wells #   123 168 211 241 289
Shut-in or suspended production wells #   4 4 95 2 6

Footnote Q:
Some wells (core holes) identified as inactive operated wells in 2013 were incorrectly categorized as such.

Wells undergoing reclamation #   G4-EN13 0 0 0 0 0
Reclamation certificates received #   G4-EN13 0 0 0 0
Compliance                
Regulatory contraventions # G4-EN29 57 91 15 12  7

Footnote R:
A regulatory contravention is an environmental incident that breaches a regulatory limit (prescribed threshold required by legislation, approval or permit from a regulatory authority) or requirement (any law, act, regulation, licence, standard, approval, directive and/or permit applicable to Suncor’s activities) and that triggers formal regulatory reporting.

Regulatory fines $ thousands G4-EN29 0 0 0 0

Footnote S:
Data includes regulatory fines related to environmental, health and safety contraventions paid during the stated year.

Reportable spills # G4-EN24 24 28 27 28 43

Footnote T:
A reportable spill is an unplanned or accidental event resulting in a release of material either into the environment or into a location that does not usually contain the material, as specified by Alberta regulation.

  • Spills to natural water bodies
#   G4-EN24 0 0 0 0 0
Total volume of reportable spills m3 G4-EN24 111 1 081 622 239 2,074

Footnote U:
In 2014, regulations placed greater emphasis on spill reporting, resulting in a greater emphasis on spill reporting, including contractors.

2015: Volume of hydrocarbon spilled to soil was 261 m3; no hydrocarbon spills to water.

Air quality exceedances #   G4-EN29 16 16 9 15 6
Industrial wastewater limit exceedances #   G4-EN29 0 0 0 0
Environment, Health & Safety (EH&S) management                
EH&S professionals on staff  # G4-EN31 24 23 20 -- --

Footnote V:
Professionals dedicated to environment, health or safety matters. Contractors are not included in this total. Due to business unit restructuring, In Situ EH&S professionals are now reported with Oil Sands performance data.

In Situ environment footnotes
A Beginning in 2012, production stated is net bitumen sales. Previously-stated production was gross bitumen production and associated natural gas production, internally consumed and/or lost through practices such as flaring. The net volume is used to calculate emission intensities as it represents emissions associated with total plant saleable product. In 2014, production increased mainly due to this being the first full year of operations from all four stages of Firebag’s operations.
B

Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions are calculated using a facility-specific methodology which utilizes various reference methodologies that have been accepted by the relevant jurisdictions each facility is required to report its GHG emissions.  Methodology has been followed where a jurisdiction has a prescribed one and if none exists then the most applicable and accurate methods available are used to quantify each emission source.

GHG emissions and emissions intensity values are consistent with Suncor’s Specified Gas Emitter’s Regulation (SGER) Bill 3 reported Total Annual Emission (TAE) value, with an exception. The reported TAE in the SGER Compliance report excludes CO2 emissions from total indirect sources, such as third-party cogen from MacKay River.

Firebag data in this report includes all cogen emissions as Scope 1. MacKay River data includes all third-party cogen emissions associated with the steam and electricity we consume as Scope 2. Beginning in 2014 and amended in 2015, MacKay River implemented a new methodology for calculating these indirect emissions; therefore all reported data has been calculated using this method.

In Situ experienced a decrease in emission intensity compared to past years. Read more on our GHG performance.

C Suncor installed a sulphur recovery unit at Firebag in 2011
D In 2012 to 2014, increase in NOx emissions was due to the ramp-up of Firebag, which required an increase in steam generation to bring new wells online.
E In 2012 to 2014, increase in total VOCs and specified VOCs emissions were due to the increase in steam generation required to bring new wells online.
F Values include emergency and non-emergency flaring volumes. Reductions in 2015 resulted from reduced venting and flaring from our Firebag facility.
G Total energy is the sum of direct and indirect energy. It includes combustion of natural gas and internally-produced fuels, flaring and electrical power imports. For MacKay River, exported electricity sent to the grid from the third party cogen is not claimed as an indirect; only the power consumed by Suncor Operations since the cogen is independently operated by TransCanada. For Firebag, the exported electricity to the grid is deducted from the total energy use since the cogen is operated by Suncor. Direct energy consumption is calculated using lower heating value (LHV) in order to be consistent with all other operating facilities.
H

Direct energy is primary energy consumed on-site by Suncor operated facilities; it includes combustion of natural gas and internally produced fuels.

Indirect energy includes imported electricity, steam, heating and cooling duty from third parties.

The indirect energy calculation methodology credits operations for electricity exported to external users and/or other Suncor facilities. The facility that exports the electricity subtracts the value from their indirect energy use. The facility that receives the electricity counts it as a Scope 2 indirect energy use, regardless of source. As such, Firebag indirect energy figures are negative, because the amount of electricity exported was higher in value than the amount of electricity imported. The negative Firebag indirect energy figures for 2013 and 2014 are higher than the MacKay River indirect energy figures, which is why the In Situ total indirect energy figures are negative for these years. For Firebag, the exported electricity (regardless of destination) is deducted from the indirect energy use since the cogen is operated by Suncor. For MacKay River, only the imported electricity (regardless of source) is reported as indirect energy use. Power sold to the grid by the MacKay River TransCanada cogen is not included in this number.

I

Beginning in 2014, In Situ reported new volumes of surface water withdrawn and industrial runoff water used for road dust suppression and ice road building. This water is also returned to the environment as part of these activities.

The volume of treated wastewater that Oil Sands sends to our Firebag In Situ facility is removed from Firebag’s water withdrawal volume and is accounted for in the Oil Sands’ withdrawal volume.
J Total Firebag and MacKay River water consumption is comprised of water withdrawn from licenced groundwater wells, treated wastewater and industrial run-off water, minus the water returned.
K

Beginning in 2011, in order to better align with GRI reporting guidelines, Suncor has expanded the number of indicators for which it collects and reports data in the Waste management category.

Prior to 2014, waste that was reused, recycled and recovered was not included in the totals for hazardous and non-hazardous waste generated and was reported as an aggregated total. Beginning in 2014, in order to provide a more detailed breakdown of the waste streams created due to our operations, we have included this category of waste in both hazardous and non-hazardous total waste generated.
L

Hazardous waste landfilled is primarily off-spec warm lime sludge, created by upset. The period of time dealing with upset conditions at Firebag was a matter of weeks in 2013, compared to several months in2014.

Otherwise disposed includes cavern and ecopit disposal.

A reclassification of waste streams would result in the value of deep well injection in 2014 revised to 1,000,671 tonnes and 54,577 tonnes otherwise disposed in 2014 for a total hazardous waste generated value of 1,056 thousand tonnes in 2014.

M Includes sewage sent to Fort McMurray.
N This is hazardous and non-hazardous drilling waste.
O Beginning in 2012, drilling waste with greater than 8% bitumen content, hauled to the mine for re-processing, is no longer reported as waste reused onsite but has been captured in the OG7 indicator.
P Reclamation associated with the in situ footprint is tracked as the cumulative area reclaimed. As such, the total number of hectares reported from year to year may increase or decrease based on activities undertaken at the site since these activities may lead to new reclamation or re-disturbance of previously reclaimed areas. See Advisories.
Q Some wells (core holes) identified as inactive operated wells in 2013 were incorrectly categorized as such.
R A regulatory contravention is an environmental incident that breaches a regulatory limit (prescribed threshold required by legislation, approval or permit from a regulatory authority) or requirement (any law, act, regulation, licence, standard, approval, directive and/or permit applicable to Suncor’s activities) and that triggers formal regulatory reporting.
S Data includes regulatory fines related to environmental, health and safety contraventions paid during the stated year.
T A reportable spill is an unplanned or accidental event resulting in a release of material either into the environment or into a location that does not usually contain the material, as specified by Alberta regulation.
U

In 2014, regulations placed greater emphasis on spill reporting, resulting in a greater emphasis on spill reporting, including contractors.

2015: Volume of hydrocarbon spilled to soil was 261 m3; no hydrocarbon spills to water.

V Professionals dedicated to environment, health or safety matters. Contractors are not included in this total. Due to business unit restructuring, In Situ EH&S professionals are now reported with Oil Sands performance data.

Social

In Situ social footnotes
W A lost-time injury requires medical attention and results in an employee being absent from work on the next regularly scheduled workday or any subsequent workday. Lost-time injury frequency is the number of such injuries per 200,000 hours worked, divided by the number of exposure hours.
X Recordable injuries include lost-time injuries as well as medical aid injuries. Medical aid injuries require medical attentions but do not result in an employee being absent from work. Recordable injury frequency is the sum of lost time and medical aid injuries per 200,000 hours worked, divided by the number of exposure hours.
Y In July 2011, a Flint Transfield Services employee died at the Firebag site during the removal of an end cap from piping at one of the production pads.
Z Compares In Situ full-time base wage to the province of Alberta's minimum wage ($11.20/hour in 2015).
AA Beginning in 2014, this indicator is reported Suncor-wide.
BB Any externally-hired regular full-time or regular part-time employee whose permanent start date falls within the reporting period.
CC

Certain operating regions prohibit collecting information on gender, therefore data presented here may not be reflective of our entire workforce due to data availability.
Workforce diversity is calculated based on information provided voluntarily by employees. Indicators referring to ethnicity and disability reflect only those employees who consent for release of this information have been included.

DD

Beginning in 2014, salary comparison data between women and men is reported on a Suncor-wide basis as position levels are corporately administered and do not differ based on operating areas.

There were no males in business support roles in 2013.